La presa in carico infermieristica delle famiglie: confronto tra Calgary Model e Omaha System. Una revisione narrativa

Johana Raga; Paola Arcadi; Eleonora Zanella

doi:10.54103/dn/30043

Authors

Johana Raga ASST Melegnano e della Martesana, Melegnano, Italy
Paola Arcadi Bachelor School of Nursing, ASST Melegnano e della Martesana, Melegnano, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1050-4707
Eleonora Zanella ASST Melegnano Martesana https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4489-6597

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/dn/30043

Keywords:

Family Nursing, Family Care, Family Assessment, Community, Calgary Model, Omaha System

Abstract

I

BACKGROUND: Disability and chronic conditions are recognized as decisive incidents in life changes not only of those affected or affected by the discomfort, but of the entire family and community of which they are part. The exercise of care occurs through phases and interactions that concern family and community. To effectively manage them, organizational and conceptual models have been designed that allow nurses to orient themselves, structure and carry out professional action in the area, aimed at quality and results. The Calgary models and the Omaha system are compass instruments.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the Calgary and Omaha System models as potentially diversified in their approach to caring for families and microcommunities.

METHODS: Narrative literature review conducted in Cinahl, Scopus and Pubmed, with a final selection process of 20 articles.

RESULTS: 6 main areas of comparison emerged which allow us to identify the strengths of the two models and any choices of implementation appropriateness based on the contexts, manifest health problems, family or community dynamics: target population, context evaluation, interventions, results, model purposes and taxonomies.

CONCLUSION: The choice of implementation between the two models depends on the health or socio-health issues inherent in taking care of vulnerable groups included in networks of services and stakeholders with activation difficulties. Or from problems inherent to dysfunctional models of roles and relationships in families. Or complex educational interventions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Wright LM, Leahey M. Nurses and families: a guide to family assessment and intervention. 5th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2009.

2. Hennessy D, Gladin L. Report on the evaluation of the WHO multi-country family health nurse pilot study [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006 [cited 2023 Jan 11]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/107761

3. Fairfax A, Brehaut J, Colman I, Sikora L, Kazakova A, Chakraborty P, et al. A systematic review of the association between coping strategies and quality of life among caregivers of children with chronic illness and/or disability. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1587-3.

4. Marucci AR, De Caro W, Petrucci C, Lancia L, Sansoni J. ICNP®: Classificazione Internazionale per la pratica infermieristica: origini, strutturazione e sviluppo. Prof Inferm. 2015;68(2):131-40. doi: 10.7429/pi.2015.682131.

5. Topaz M, Golfenshtein N, Bowles KH. The Omaha System: a systematic review of the recent literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(1):163-70. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001491.

6. Italia. Ministero della Salute. Decreto 23 maggio 2022, n. 77. Regolamento recante la definizione di modelli e standard per lo sviluppo dell’assistenza territoriale nel Servizio sanitario nazionale. Gazz Uff Repub Ital Ser Gen. 2022 Jun 22;(144).

7. Aktas B, Yilmaz M, Kaplan N, Cankiri B. Application of the Omaha System in the determination of healthcare needs of individuals receiving home healthcare. J Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2017;6(1):379.

8. Dias BC, Marcon SS, Reis P, Lino IGT, Okido ACC, Ichisato SMT, et al. Family dynamics and social network of families of children with special needs for complex/continuous cares. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2020;41. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190178.

9. Zimansky M, Stasielowicz L, Franke I, Remmers H, Friedel H, Atzpodien J. Effects of implementing a brief family nursing intervention with hospitalized oncology patients and their families in Germany: a quasi-experimental study. J Fam Nurs. 2020;26(4):346-57. doi: 10.1177/1074840720967022.

10. Voltelen B, Konradsen H, Østergaard B. Family nursing therapeutic conversations in heart failure outpatient clinics in Denmark: nurses’ experiences. J Fam Nurs. 2016;22(2):172-98. doi: 10.1177/1074840716643879.

11. Misto K. Family perceptions of family nursing in a Magnet institution during acute hospitalizations of older adult patients. Clin Nurs Res. 2019;28(5):548-66. doi: 10.1177/1054773817748400.

12. Radovanovic CAT, Cecilio HPM, Marcon SS. Structural, developmental and functional evaluation of the family of individuals with arterial hypertension. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2013;34(1):45-54. doi: 10.1590/S1983-14472013000100006.

13. Thome M, Arnardottir SB. Evaluation of a family nursing intervention for distressed pregnant women and their partners: a single group before and after study. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(4):805-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06063.x.

14. Sassá AH, Marcon SS. Evaluation of families of infants with very low birth weight in home care. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2013;22(2):442-51. doi: 10.1590/S0104-07072013000200021.

15. Ardic A, Esin MN, Koc S, Bayraktar B, Sunal N. Using the Omaha System to determine health problems of urban Syrian immigrants. Public Health Nurs. 2019;36(2):126-33. doi: 10.1111/phn.12563.

16. Monsen KA, Radosevich DM, Johnson SC, Farri O, Kerr MJ, Geppert JS. Benchmark attainment by maternal and child health clients across public health nursing agencies. Public Health Nurs. 2012;29(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2011.00967.x.

17. Garcia C, McNaughton DB, Radosevich DM, Brandt J, Monsen KA. Family home visiting outcomes for Latina mothers with and without mental health problems. Public Health Nurs. 2013;30(5):429-38. doi: 10.1111/phn.12054.

18. Garvin JH, Martin KS, Stassen DL, Bowles KH. The Omaha System: coded data that describe patient care. J AHIMA. 2008;79(3):44-9; quiz 51-2.

19. Camilo LA, Couto LL, Barreto ACM, Santos ACS, Regazzi ICR, Pinto LF. Family violence against children: approach to nursing through genogram and ecomap. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2021;13:1554-60. doi: 10.9789/2175-5361.rpcfo.v13.10443.

20. Alarcon MFS, Cardoso BC, Ala CB, Damaceno DG, Sponchiado VBY, Marin MJS. Elderly victims of violence: family assessment through the Calgary model. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2022;43. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20200218.

21. Park YS, McNaughton DB, Mathiason MA, Monsen KA. Understanding tailored public health nursing interventions and outcomes of Latina mothers. Public Health Nurs. 2019;36(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/phn.12559.

22. Mileski M, McClay R, Heinemann K, Dray G. Efficacy of the use of the Calgary Family Intervention Model in bedside nursing education: a systematic review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:1323-47. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S370053.

23. Kumar P, Khan AM, Inder D, Anu. Provider’s constraints and difficulties in primary health care system. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(2):102-6. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.137610.

24. Thompson HJ, Monsen KA, Wanamaker MH, Augustyniak K, Thompson M. Using the Omaha System for clinical data management and outcomes measurement in practice, quality improvement, and research. Appl Clin Inform. 2012;3(4):419-437. doi:10.4338/ACI-2012-05-RA-0016.

25. Wei L, Wang J, Li Z, Zhang Y, Gao Y. Design and implementation of an Omaha System-based integrated nursing management model for patients with newly-diagnosed diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019;13(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.11.001.

26. Silva MCLSR, Moules NJ, Silva L, Bousso RS. The 15-minute family interview: a family health strategy tool. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(3):634-9. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420130000300016.

27. Martin KS, Monsen KA, Bowles KH. The Omaha System and meaningful use: applications for practice, education, and research. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(1):52-8. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9ddc6.

28. Monsen KA, Swenson SM, Klotzbach LV, Mathiason MA, Johnson KE. Empirical evaluation of the changes in public health nursing interventions after the implementation of an evidence-based family home visiting guideline. Kontakt. 2017;19(2). doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.03.002.

29. İncirkuş K, Nahcivan N. Hypertension management in primary care: feasibility of using the Omaha System as a clinical information system. Int J Caring Sci. 2020;13(2):1629-38.

30. Jasemi M, Valizadeh L, Zamanzadeh V, Keogh B. A concept analysis of holistic care by hybrid model. Indian J Palliat Care. 2017;23(1):71-80. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.197960.

31. Pilarska A, Zimmermann A, Zdun-Ryżewska A. Access to health information in the Polish healthcare system: survey research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12):7320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127320.

32. Kang C, Tomkow L, Farrington R. Access to primary health care for asylum seekers and refugees: a qualitative study of service user experiences in the UK. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(685). doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701309.

33. Federazione Nazionale Ordini Professioni Infermieristiche. Rafforzare l’assistenza infermieristica sul territorio: la necessità del futuro [Internet]. Roma: FNOPI; 2019 Oct 30. Available from: https://www.fnopi.it/aree-tematiche/infermieristica-territoriale/